Restaurant website accessibility: review the menu, order and reservation routes
Check the tasks a guest needs to finish. A useful review follows the whole route, including pages provided by an outside ordering or reservation service.
A guest may visit your site to find the menu, order dinner or reserve a table. Try those tasks yourself before judging the site from its home page. The important question is whether the route works all the way through.
The DOJ web accessibility guidance says the ADA requirements for businesses open to the public include goods and services offered on the web. This article gives a practical review plan. It does not determine your restaurant's legal obligations or predict a claim.
Make the menu available as information
Open the menu from the same link a guest would use. Is the information readable on the page, or is the only version a picture? W3C's Images Tutorial explains text alternatives and ways to handle images with substantial information. A menu needs its contents available, not just the label Menu.
Our recommendation is to keep a readable text version with the current dishes and prices. Have the menu owner compare it with the visual version. Check any important notes against the approved menu. Do not invent ingredient or dietary information to fill a gap.
Include menu updates in the normal content routine. A readable version from last season does not give the guest the same information as the current image. Name the person who updates both versions when the kitchen changes the offer.
Try the order route with a keyboard
Start at the restaurant page and follow the order link. Note whether it opens another service or a new page. Try reaching categories, item choices and the cart with the keyboard. W3C's Keyboard guidance explains the keyboard accessibility requirement used in WCAG.
Agree with staff on a safe test before going beyond the cart. Do not create an order that the kitchen will prepare by mistake. Record the steps you can inspect safely and ask the provider how to test the remaining route.
If you encounter a barrier, save the page address and the item or option involved. A report that says ordering is inaccessible gives the provider little to repeat. A precise report names the control and the step where the task stopped.
Include choices and corrections
A guest may need to change a quantity or remove an item. Try those actions as part of the agreed test. If the site presents an error, check whether it explains what needs attention. W3C's Forms Tutorial covers form labels, instructions and feedback.
Treat the ordering service as part of the guest's route even when another company runs it. Ask the provider who receives accessibility reports and how a repair is confirmed. Keep the support contact with your website records so staff can find it later.
Review reservations as their own task
Begin at the restaurant's reservation link and choose an available date in the safe test environment. Check whether the guest can understand the fields and move through them. If the provider offers a test mode, use the process they recommend.
Try correcting a mistaken choice before submission. Ask what happens when no times are available. The owner should know which message the guest sees and which alternative route the restaurant can actually support. Do not promise availability through a route staff cannot manage.
Give staff a useful way to receive reports
Provide a contact route for guests who encounter a problem. Tell staff how to record the page and task without asking for unnecessary personal information. If a guest calls about ordering trouble, save the technical observation separately from payment or account information.
A phone number can be useful, but it should not become the end of the repair plan. Keep the reported website barrier assigned to someone who can investigate. Tell the guest what assistance the restaurant can actually provide, and avoid making a legal assurance.
Retest when the menu or provider changes
Keep a short list of the menu, ordering and reservation routes. Record which provider owns each part. After a menu redesign or service update, repeat the important tasks and compare the results. Save dates and observations with the person responsible for the site.
This review does not use an industry lawsuit percentage. We do not have a sourced restaurant-specific figure here, so we do not estimate one. The reason for testing is concrete: guests need to read the offer and complete the intended task.
If you cannot assess a control, bring in an accessibility tester. An owner check is useful preparation, but it cannot cover every assistive technology or legal question. Keep the findings specific and let the appropriate professional assess the rest.
Access Heroes may earn a commission if you buy a tool we recommend. You pay the tool's maker directly, and we always tell you before you sign up. This article is general information, not legal or tax advice.
Sources
Want help checking your restaurant's menu or booking route? Book a free web accessibility check with TJ. He will look at your site with you and tell you what to fix first.
Comments